| Day1 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 12:00 |
hrs |
|
Welcome luncheon in Mercure restaurant |
| |
|
|
|
| 13:00 |
hrs |
|
Opening and handing over the 1st Conasense book (hall 10) |
| |
|
|
|
| 13:10 |
hrs |
|
Minutes of February 13-14, 2012 |
| |
|
|
|
| 13:20 |
hrs |
|
News Letter of January 3, 2013 |
| |
|
|
|
| 13:40 |
hrs |
|
Plenary discussion on establishing WG1 and WG2 |
| |
|
|
|
| 14:30 |
hrs |
|
Coffee break |
| |
|
|
|
| 14:45 |
hrs |
|
WG1 and WG2 meetings in parallel |
| |
|
|
|
| 17:30 |
hrs |
|
Closing |
| |
|
|
|
| 18:30 |
hrs |
|
Drinks |
| |
|
|
|
| 19:00 |
hrs |
|
Diner |
| |
|
|
|
| Day2 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 9:00 |
hrs |
|
Plenary discussion on status WG1 and WG2 |
| |
|
|
|
| 9:45 |
hrs |
|
WG1 and WG2 meetings in parallel |
| |
|
|
|
| 10:30 |
hrs |
|
Coffee break |
| |
|
|
|
| 10:45 |
hrs |
|
WG1 and WG2 meetings in parallel |
| |
|
|
|
| 11:30 |
hrs |
|
Summary reports working groups WG1 and WG2 |
| |
|
|
|
| 12:45 |
hrs |
|
Actions |
| |
|
|
|
| 13:00 |
hrs |
|
Closing luncheo |
| |
|
|
|
| WG1: |
Quality of Life (QoL) |
| |
I enjoyed very much your contributions and visionary plans in various most challenging areas in which cross-roads of disciplines (technical and non-technical) are integrated. A strong Conasense working group can give Conasense a global place on the QoL roadmap leading towards medium and long term services improving QoL. |
| |
Based on the various contributions to the 1st Conasense book I made a first (very preliminary) set-up for potential organizations who want to become WG1 members. As could be derived from the contents of the book chapters I estimated the volumes of the various contributions per organization. The sequence indicates my estimates on contributions per organization |
| |
| CTIF Roma |
CTIF Aalborg |
| Eindhoven Univ. |
Univ. of Firenze |
| TNO-ICT |
Univ. of Padua |
|
| |
|
| WG2: |
Intelligent Conasense Architectures (I-CA) |
| |
This working group is certainly needed for creating advanced platforms able to support the high demands in medium and long term services improving QoL. The I-CA roadmap should show ‘the points on the horizon’ and ‘the necessary steps how to come there’. Focus in WG2 can be: ‘Design, simulation and development of demonstrators for ”Everything” what is not realizable in the foreseeable future and what is essential in improving QoL’. |
| |
To my opinion all Conasense organizations can be interested to become WG2 member. Next sequence indicates my estimates on contributions per organization |
| |
| CTIF Aalborg |
CTIF Roma |
| Eindhoven Univ. |
Univ. of Padua |
| National Taiwan Univ. |
TNO-ICT |
| Univ. Sofia |
Gauss Foundation |
| Univ. Hacettepe |
Terma |
| Univ. of Firenze |
CHL |
| Delft Univ. |
|
|
