Day1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12:00 |
hrs |
|
Welcome luncheon in Mercure restaurant |
|
|
|
|
13:00 |
hrs |
|
Opening and handing over the 1st Conasense book (hall 10) |
|
|
|
|
13:10 |
hrs |
|
Minutes of February 13-14, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
13:20 |
hrs |
|
News Letter of January 3, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
13:40 |
hrs |
|
Plenary discussion on establishing WG1 and WG2 |
|
|
|
|
14:30 |
hrs |
|
Coffee break |
|
|
|
|
14:45 |
hrs |
|
WG1 and WG2 meetings in parallel |
|
|
|
|
17:30 |
hrs |
|
Closing |
|
|
|
|
18:30 |
hrs |
|
Drinks |
|
|
|
|
19:00 |
hrs |
|
Diner |
|
|
|
|
Day2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9:00 |
hrs |
|
Plenary discussion on status WG1 and WG2 |
|
|
|
|
9:45 |
hrs |
|
WG1 and WG2 meetings in parallel |
|
|
|
|
10:30 |
hrs |
|
Coffee break |
|
|
|
|
10:45 |
hrs |
|
WG1 and WG2 meetings in parallel |
|
|
|
|
11:30 |
hrs |
|
Summary reports working groups WG1 and WG2 |
|
|
|
|
12:45 |
hrs |
|
Actions |
|
|
|
|
13:00 |
hrs |
|
Closing luncheo |
|
|
|
|
WG1: |
Quality of Life (QoL) |
|
I enjoyed very much your contributions and visionary plans in various most challenging areas in which cross-roads of disciplines (technical and non-technical) are integrated. A strong Conasense working group can give Conasense a global place on the QoL roadmap leading towards medium and long term services improving QoL. |
|
Based on the various contributions to the 1st Conasense book I made a first (very preliminary) set-up for potential organizations who want to become WG1 members. As could be derived from the contents of the book chapters I estimated the volumes of the various contributions per organization. The sequence indicates my estimates on contributions per organization |
|
CTIF Roma |
CTIF Aalborg |
Eindhoven Univ. |
Univ. of Firenze |
TNO-ICT |
Univ. of Padua |
|
|
|
WG2: |
Intelligent Conasense Architectures (I-CA) |
|
This working group is certainly needed for creating advanced platforms able to support the high demands in medium and long term services improving QoL. The I-CA roadmap should show ‘the points on the horizon’ and ‘the necessary steps how to come there’. Focus in WG2 can be: ‘Design, simulation and development of demonstrators for ”Everything” what is not realizable in the foreseeable future and what is essential in improving QoL’. |
|
To my opinion all Conasense organizations can be interested to become WG2 member. Next sequence indicates my estimates on contributions per organization |
|
CTIF Aalborg |
CTIF Roma |
Eindhoven Univ. |
Univ. of Padua |
National Taiwan Univ. |
TNO-ICT |
Univ. Sofia |
Gauss Foundation |
Univ. Hacettepe |
Terma |
Univ. of Firenze |
CHL |
Delft Univ. |
|
|